CANCER MORTALITIES LINKED TO ARTIFICIAL WATER FLUORIDATION --- STOP FLUORIDATION IMMEDIATELY

action@waterloowatch.com                                                                                                 www.waterloowatch.com

Site managed by:  WaterlooWatch – Updated:  May 1st, 2008

Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA                                                                                                                                         Disclaimer

AT ISSUE: PUTTING HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID INTO WATERLOO’S CLEAN DRINKING WATER 

 

 

 
CLICK ON MORE INFORMATION LINKS BELOW
 

 

 

Get Adobe Reader

 

WaterlooWatch Statement

 

Brief introduction

 

Waterloo’s  1981-82 Referendums  (Two)

 

We Put HFSA In  Our  Water

 

Fluoridation Concentration,  Dose  &  Studies

 

Fluoridation Reasons Dwindle

 

Fluorosilicate Toxicity

 

Environmental Effects Of Hydrofluorosilicic Acid

 

Costs Of Water Fluoridation

 

Fluoride in Foods & Beverages

 

Illogical Way To Deliver Fluoride Drug

 

 

Is The Region On Top Of Things?

 

Ontario Ministry Of Health Fluoride Letter To Medical Officers

 

Regional Website Water Fluoridation Information

up Until 11–Jan–08

 

SDWA Responsibilities & Liabilities

 

Fluoridation Chemicals & Canadian Laws

 

Fluoridation Ethics

 

Canadian Professionals Opposed To Water Fluoridation

 

Ontario Clean Water Act 2006 Reg 231-07

 

Ontario Fluoridation   Act 1990

 

Ontario Safe Drinking Water Act 2002

 

MOE 2003 Technical Support Document

 

MOE 2004 Certification Guide for Operators

 

MOE 2005 Guideline No. 5.1

 

Ontario Water Resources 1990

 

Canadian Fisheries Act 1985

 

E-mail  WaterlooWatch

 

E-MAIL  WATERLOO COUNCIL

 

E-MAIL  REGIONAL COUNCIL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

 

SEE:  WATERLOOWATCH  INITIATIVES  AT  THE  BOTTOM  OF  THIS  HOMEPAGE

 

E-mail  WaterlooWatch  
 
 

WHY is the City of Waterloo allowing the Region of Waterloo to continue adding ‘fluoride’, specifically …

 

HydrofluORosilicic

acid,

 

including traces of

 

 arsenic and lead

 

into our city’s drinking water?

 

HydrofluORosilicic

acid,

 

 has never been tested

 

for

 

 safety  or  efficacy

 

 

How can anyone claim that such water ‘fluoridation’ provides a SAFE dose when neither the concentration nor the dose can be effectively controlled per individual

or per an individual's consumption?

 

 

 

US National Research Council, Fluoride In Drinking Water, Published 2006

Free On-line Book Read:

The latest, most comprehensive review of water fluoridation to date.

Reviews a broad spectrum of research evidence from many different disciplines.

 

NRC 2006 – 1,000 recent studies examining effects of fluoride in drinking water on:

 

Teeth – Chapter 4

Bones – Chapter 5

Reproductive & Developmental Effects – Chapter 6

Brain, Nervous System – Chapter 7

Endocrine Function (Thyroid, Parathyroid, Pineal Glands) –   Chapter 8

Gut, Kidney, Liver, Immune System – Chapter 9

Cancer – Chapter 10

 

Water fluoridation is the largest source of fluoride exposure / over-exposure and the easiest to eliminate. 

 

"The major dietary source of fluoride for most people in the United States is fluoridated municipal (community) drinking water, including water consumed directly, food and beverages prepared at home or in restaurants from municipal drinking water, and commercial beverages and processed foods originating from fluoridated municipalities."

 

NRC 2006 p. 24

 

 

 

Read Book Reviews

Book Reviews:

 

CHRISTOPHER BRYSON:

 

ON WRITING

 

   “THE  FLUORIDE  DECEPTION”

 

I’m a reporter…  I stumbled on the story in 1993.  I was working in New York as a BBC radio producer and was asked to find "an American angle" on water fluoridation.  Ralph Nader put me in touch with a couple of government scientists (William Hirzy at the EPA and Robert Carton at the U.S. Army) who opposed water fluoridation, and explained how the science underpinning the nation’s (US) fluoride safety standards was fraudulent...  I just kept reporting.”

 

BBC Reporter & Author Christopher Bryson Speaks About Fluoride's Fraudulent Science

Christopher Bryson Interview:

Video 29 min.  July, 2004

 

 

 

Carole A. Clinch

(Waterloo, Ontario)

 

“I had used thyroid hormone supplements for years.  After reviewing research on fluoride, I realized even at ‘optimal doses’ fluoride potentially interfered with both iodine and thyroid metabolism.

 

I decided to conduct an experiment on myself.  I began taking small doses of iodine under the supervision of an iodine research health professional from the USA.  Within weeks I could successfully reduce my dose of thyroid supplements by 50%.

 

The next step was to reduce all my fluoride sources as much as possible.  Within one month I was able to eliminate thyroid hormone supplementation without any recurrence of hypothyroid symptoms.  Blood serum tests for thyroid function moved into the optimal range."

 

Research Appears Correct:

 

 

Also See: Fluoride in Foods

 

 

“Fluoride is the most consumed drug in the U.S., and it’s time we talked about it.”

 

Paul Connett, Chemistry Professor at St. Lawrence University, and Executive Director – Fluoride Action Network

 

 

 

"I was the counsel for the plaintiffs in rigorous trials in Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Texas, resulting in judicial findings in all three cases - based on the quality of the evidence heard on both sides - that artificial fluoridation of public water supplies induces large-scale cancer and other ailments in man. Eminent experts from great universities, government institutions, and the private sector appeared in all three cases, and were all subjected to direct and cross examination by veteran trial lawyers before experienced trial judges. The professional union at the national headquarters of the United States Environmental Protection Agency later reviewed these judicial findings, and certified them as scientifically correct to a subcommittee of the United States Senate.  Since those hearings, the evidence reported in leading scientific and medical journals has extensively confirmed and elaborated what the three judges found.  Under these circumstances, it is morally irresponsible to continue this practice, and governments have an urgent duty to end it."